When we look at two events in the life of Abraham, we are confronted with events that are very confusing. In other words, something just doesn't make sense. In Bereshith (Genesis) 18, Abraham pleads for the inhabitants of Sedom (Sodom) and Amorah. You know the story: because of the wickedness of these two cities, YHWH has sent His angels to destroy them. Abraham bargains with YHWH for their lives. However, in Bereshith 22, when YHWH asks Abraham to offer his son Issac as a sacrifice, there is no bargaining at all. It would seem to me that it would make more sense for Abraham to argue for the son he loves than for the wicked inhabitants in Sedom and Amorah. Can these passages be interpreted in a way that makes logical sense? I think so, but it requires understanding the Hebraic approach to the Scriptures.
In the cases of Sedom and Amorah, their fate is tied to the realm of din, i.e. justice. YHWH has declared that the inhabitants are wicked and because of that justice demands that they be destroyed. When in the realm of din, things make sense. Therefore, Abraham can argue his case for mercy. It is in the area of din that man can arise and confront YHWH for the defense of the wicked. However, in the case of Issac, it takes place in the realm of nissayon, i.e. trial. In matters that are trials or tests, man's challenge is to pass the test. One does not seek to escape; instead, one seeks to respond with faith and dignity. Now we can understand why Abraham could plead for the wicked, but not for his son. Abraham was able to know the difference between din and nissayon.
Our challenge is to do the same. We must comprehend the difference between a matter of justice and a matter of trial. Abraham was flesh and blood and he was able to do so. We must do our best to do likewise. If you find yourself in a trial, the best advice is to pray, believe, and act in faith. When you have exhausted your efforts, turn to YHWH and accept His all encompassing love and Divine will.
Tsade
1 day ago
No comments:
Post a Comment